Recommend Epigenetics to your librarian today. Download form here.
Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts.
The official journal of the Epigenetics Society.
Email this page
Print this page
Review
Genomic imprinting in plants
Olivier Garnier, Sylvia Laoueillé-Duprat and Charles Spillane
volume 3 | issue 1
January/February 2008Pages: 14 - 20
Subscribe to this journal for $79/year
Genomic imprinting attracted particular attention in the 1980s following the discovery that the parental origin of genetic information is essential for normal development of eutherians,1,2 for review see.3 The term imprinting was first introduced in the 1960s to describe the elimination of the paternal chromosomes during spermatogenesis in the Sciarid fly.4‑6 Today the term genomic imprinting mainly refers to parent‑of‑origin specific effects distinguishing each parental genome which can be regarded as memories, or imprints.7,8 Breaking the rules of Mendel, genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon per se. Epigenetics is currently defined as the study of mitotically or meiotically heritable changes in gene expression without any change in DNA sequence9,10 and it is intimately linked to the study of inheritance of chromatin states.11 Gene imprinting currently refers to differential expression of autosomal genes according to their parent of origin.12 The phenomenon of genomic imprinting explains several cases of parent‑specific human disorders.13 To date over 80 imprinted genes have been described in mammals14 and their parent‑of‑origin specific expression can correlate with changes in DNA methylation patterns, antisense noncoding RNAs and chromatin folding.3 Epigenetic imprints can either activate or silence the imprinted allele, and hence imprinting can be associated with either an expressed or silenced allele.15 In mammals, the number of paternally expressed imprinted genes is almost equivalent to the number of maternally expressed genes and the imprinted status can differs according to tissue, developmental stage and species. It is then crucial for our understanding to clearly indicate the status of imprinting (i.e., paternally or maternally expressed) and the context (e.g., species, developmental stage, tissue).
Authors
Olivier Garnier
University College Cork
Sylvia Laoueillé-Duprat
University College Cork
Charles Spillane
University College Cork






