Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts.
Email this page
Print this page
Report
Replication Timing Profile Reflects the Distinct Functional and Genomic Features of the MHC Class II Region
Petros Takousis, Peter Johonnett, Jill Williamson, Peter Sasieni, Gary Warnes, Tim Forshew, Veronique Azuara, Amanda Fisher, Pei-Jun Wu, Tania Jones, Radost Vatcheva, Stephan Beck and Denise Sheer
volume 6 | issue 19
1 October 2007Pages: 2393 - 2398
This is an open-access article
If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.
The timing of DNA replication generally correlates with transcription, gene density and sequence composition. How is the timing affected if a genomic region has a combination of features that individually correlate with either early or late replication? The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II region is an AT-rich isochore that would be expected to replicate late, but it also contains coordinately regulated genes that are highly expressed in antigen-presenting cells and are strongly inducible in other cell types. Using cytological and biochemical assays, we find that the entire MHC replicates within the first half of S-phase, and that the class II region replicates slightly later than the adjacent regions irrespective of gene expression. These data suggest that despite AT-richness, an early-to-middle replication time in the class II region is defined by an open chromatin conformation that allows rapid transcriptional activation as a defence against pathogens.
Authors
Petros Takousis
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Peter Johonnett
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Jill Williamson
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Peter Sasieni
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine; London UK
Gary Warnes
Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry; London UK
Tim Forshew
Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry; London UK
Veronique Azuara
Imperial College School of Medicine; London UK
Amanda Fisher
Imperial College School of Medicine; London UK
Pei-Jun Wu
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Tania Jones
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Radost Vatcheva
Cancer Research UK London Research Institute; London UK
Stephan Beck
Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute; Cambridge UK
Denise Sheer
Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry; London UK
This is an open-access article
If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.









