Sign up for Table of Contents Alerts.
Email this page
Print this page
Clinical Study
Preclinical and Clinical Studies With the Multi-Kinase Inhibitor CEP-701 as Treatment for Prostate Cancer Demonstrate the Inadequacy of PSA Response as a Primary Endpoint
Connie Collins, Michael A. Carducci, Mario A. Eisenberger, John T. Isaacs, Alan W. Partin, Roberto Pili, Victoria J. Sinibaldi, Janet S. Walczak and Samuel R. Denmeade
volume 6 | issue 9
September 2007Pages: 1360 - 1367
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.
PURPOSE: CEP-701 is a potent inhibitor of trk receptors that causes cell death in prostate cancer (PC) models. CEP-701 binds to serum proteins and a preprostatectomy study was performed to assess prostate tissue penetration and clinical response to CEP-701.
METHODS: Growth assays and western blot analyses were performed to evaluate CEP-701 kinase inhibition. In a preprostatectomy study, patients received CEP-701 for five days prior to prostatectomy and prostate tissue analyzed for CEP-701 levels. A phase II dose escalation study was performed in patients with hormone refractory PC with rising PSA and no metastases. Endpoints included PSA response and safety.
RESULTS: CEP-701 binds to serum proteins limiting tissue penetration. An oral dose of 40 mg bid of CEP-701 for five days produced levels of 219 ± 38 nM in prostate at time of prostatectomy. No patients in the Phase II study met the primary response criteria of > 50% PSA decline. 7/9 patients had increase in PSA slope on CEP-701 compared to PSA slope prestudy. 5/9 patients had a decrease in PSA levels after stopping CEP-701. Laboratory studies showed increased PSA production by CEP-701 growth arrested human PC cells in vitro and in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of PSA response is an inadequate indicator of response in CEP-701 treated PC patients. Therefore, the effectiveness of CEP-701 as treatment for prostate cancer has not been adequately tested. Based on a strong preclinical rationale, further clinical studies with CEP-701 using alternative endpoints are indicated.
Authors
Connie Collins
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Michael A. Carducci
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Mario A. Eisenberger
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
John T. Isaacs
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Alan W. Partin
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Roberto Pili
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Victoria J. Sinibaldi
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Janet S. Walczak
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
Samuel R. Denmeade
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland USA
We now provide open access to journal articles published online for one year or more. This article may be downloaded at the following link:
If the document does not open, please right-click on the link (control-click on a Macintosh) and select the option to save the file to disk.





